Supreme Court SLP(C)No. 2229 OF 2005 050712

ITEM NO.7 COURT NO.2 SECTION XII




S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS




Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).2229 OF 2005


(From the judgement and order dated 23/12/2004 in WA No.2091/2004

of the HIGH COURT OF MADRAS)




SECRETARY TO GOVT., H.F.W.D. & ORS. Petitioner(s)


VERSUS


M. SATHYAPRIYA & ANR. Respondent(s)


(With prayer for interim relief and office report)


With S.L.P. (C) Nos.6188-6231 of 2005

(With appln.(s) for vacating stay, prayer for interim relief and

office report)




Date: 12/07/2005 These Petitions were called on for hearing today.




CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Y.K. SABHARWAL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MATHUR





For Petitioner(s) Mr. Subramonium Prasad,Adv.




For Respondent(s) Mr. M.A. Chinnasamy,Adv.


Mr. Maninder Singh,Adv.

Ms. Pratibha M. Singh,Adv.

Mr. Angad Mirdha,Adv.





UPON hearing counsel the Court made the following

O R D E R




Dasti notice be given for service on unserved respondents in

S.L.P. (C) Nos.6188-6231 of 2005.





[ T.I. Rajput ] [ V.P. Tyagi ]

Court Master Court Master

What is Dasti Service ?

The law permits the plaintiff to serve notice . It is called dasti service or hand summons wherein the petitioner is also given the permission to serve contempt notices on the contemners. A copy of the summons is obtained from the court registry and served on the party with an acknowledgement taken.

CET: Supreme Court refuses to stay High Court order

The Hindu News Update Service: "CET: Supreme Court refuses to stay High Court order
J. Venkatesan
New Delhi, July 4. The Supreme Court on Monday declined to stay the operation of a Madras High Court judgment quashing a Tamil Nadu Government order scrapping Common Entrance Test (CET) for admission to medicine, engineering and other professional courses for the year 2005-2006.
A Vacation Bench of Justice D.M. Dharamadhikari and Justice S.H. Kapadia, while rejecting Tamil Nadu Government�s plea for interim stay of the High Court judgment, directed that the special leave petition be listed for hearing after the reopening of the court after the summer vacation.
When senior counsel P. P. Rao appearing for the State insisted for stay of the judgment, the Bench said �let admissions be made this year on the basis of the CET. You have issued the GO after holding the CET. In this situation, in the interest of the students, let admissions be made for this year on the basis of the CET.�
However, Rao insisted that in the interest of poor and rural students the court should entertain the matter. But the Bench pointed out that the High Court had quashed the GO only on the ground that the GO violated the various regulations issued by the Medical Council of India and the All India Council for Technical Education.
�How can you find fault with this order? You await the judgment of the seven-judge Bench(dealing with the education matter) and therefore you give a quietus of the policy decision for this year,� the Bench said and adjourned the matter after the vacation. "

PG Aspirants Fight for rights in Karnataka - Merit Vs Might

PG Aspirants: Fight for our rights -Merit Vs Might